Sunday, 31 July 2011

Your Favorite Body Lotions

There are literally hundreds of different body lotions on the market today. The texture of body lotions vary from light and silky to thick and greasy. Dry skin is a common problem among women. Dry skin can result from many different health conditions from thyroid disorders to Sjogren's syndrome to menopause. Whether your skin is just a little bit dry or so dry it feels like sandpaper, you've probably bought and used a few types of body? lotions. What's your favorite body lotion?

Write a review about your favorite body lotion!

?

?

Source: http://womenshealth.about.com/b/2011/07/02/your-favorite-body-lotions.htm

womens health advice womens health insurance women and health women health problems

Listeria Forces Recalls of Ready-to-Eat Chicken, Meat

Chicken Nuggets and Other Recalled Products Were Sold by Dollar General, Starbucks, Race Trac, and Other Stores

By Daniel J. DeNoon
WebMD Health News

Latest Infectious Disease News

Reviewed by Laura J. Martin, MD

July 27, 2011 -- Pilgrim's pride has recalled 18,312 pounds of chicken nuggets and chicken fillets sold at Dollar General stores in nine states.

Contamination with potentially deadly listeria bacteria was detected in the fully cooked products.

In a separate recall, also due to listeria contamination, Flying Foods has recalled some 7,000 pounds of ready-to-eat chicken, turkey, beef, and pork products sold in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. Some of the products were sold in Starbucks stores, which on Monday removed all Flying Foods products from their shelves.

To date, no illnesses have been reported from consumers of the recalled products. Listeria bacteria can cause serious and often fatal illness, especially in pregnant women, people with immune suppression, and older adults.

Pilgrim's Pride Chicken Recall

On July 20, Pilgrim's Pride recalled 11,240 pounds of ready-to-eat chicken products:

  • 10-pound boxes containing two 5-pound bags of "Sweet Georgia Brand Fully Cooked Breaded White Chicken Nuggets Shaped Patties." There is a date code of 11471010 ink-jetted on the box, which bears the establishment number P-7091A inside the USDA mark of inspection. Each 5-pound bag is marked with the date code and P-7091A. This product was shipped to distribution centers in Texas and New Jersey for further distribution to other food service vendors.
  • 30-pound boxes containing six 5-pound bags of "Pilgrim's Pride Fully Cooked Grilled Chicken Breast Fillet with Rib Meat." There is a date code of 11801050 and a Use By Date of Dec. 26, 2011 ink-jetted on the box, which bears the establishment number P-20728 inside the USDA mark of inspection. The inner bags are marked with the code date and Use By Date. This product was shipped to distribution centers in Ohio for further distribution.

On July 26, Pilgrim's Pride added 7,072 pounds of ready-to-eat chicken to the recall:

  • 16-pound boxes containing eight 2-pound bags of "Pilgrim's Pride Fully Cooked Chicken Breast Breaded Nugget Shaped Patties with Rib Meat."
  • The 16-pound boxes have a date code of 11531010 ink-jetted on the box, a best-by date of "JUN 02 2012," and the establishment number "P-7091A" inside the USDA mark of inspection.
  • Each 2-pound bag is marked with the date code and "P-7091A." These bags were shipped to Dollar General stores in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.

Flying Foods Recall of Chicken, Turkey, Beef, and Pork Products

In a separate recall, also due to contamination with listeria bacteria, Flying Foods LLC has issued two recalls.

On July 19, the company recalled some 204 pounds of ready-to eat chicken wraps and plates:

  • 8.4-ounce packages of "STARBUCKS CHIPOTLE CHICKEN WRAPS Bistro Box"
  • 6.3-ounce packages of "STARBUCKS CHICKEN & HUMMUS Bistro Box"

These products have an "Enjoy by 071511" date on the bottom left corner of the package and bear the establishment number P34373 inside the USDA inspection mark. They were distributed only in Georgia and Alabama.

On July 26, Flying Foods expanded the recall to include 6,901 pounds of ready-to-eat chicken, turkey, beef, and pork products. The packages bear the establishment number "P-34373" or EST. 34373 inside the USDA mark of inspection.

These products were distributed in Alabama and Georgia:

  • 8.4-ounce packages of "STARBUCKS CHIPOTLE CHICKEN WRAPS Bistro Box" that have "Enjoy by" dates of 7/16-7/26 stamped on the package.
  • 6.3-ounce packages of "STARBUCKS CHICKEN & HUMMUS Bistro Box" that have "Enjoy by" dates of 7/16-7/26 stamped on the package.
  • 4.6-ounce packages of "STARBUCKS SALUMI & CHEESE Bistro Box" that have "Enjoy by" dates of 7/15-7/26 stamped on the package.
  • 7.3-ounce packages of "STARBUCKS CHICKEN LETTUCE WRAPS Bistro Box" that have "Enjoy by" dates of 7/15-7/26 stamped on the package.

These products were distributed in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia:

  • 9.75-ounce packages of "RaceTrac TURKEY WRAP" that have "Sell thru" dates of 7/17-7/28 stamped on the package.
  • 10.3-ounce packages of "RaceTrac CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD" that have "Sell thru" dates of 7/17-7/28 stamped on the package.
  • 7.88-ounce packages of "RaceTrac CHICKEN CAESAR WRAP" that have "Sell thru" dates of 7/17-7/28 stamped on the package.
  • 9.8-ounce packages of "RaceTrac COBB SALAD" that have "Sell thru" dates of 7/17-7/28 stamped on the package.
  • 6.4-ounce trays of "F&L CAFE Salad, Chicken Caesar Salad" that have "Best Before" dates of 7/23-8/3 stamped on the package.
  • 6.9-ounce trays of "F&L CAFE Salad, Chef Salad" dates of 7/23-8/3 stamped on the package.

Listeria Food Poisoning

The bacterium Listeria monocytogenes is found in soil and water. It tends to contaminate foods from animals, such as meats and unpasteurized dairy products.

The bacteria can live on surfaces for years. They're killed by thorough cooking. However, contamination of food processing plants can spread the bacteria to cooked foods. Moreover, listeria can grow and multiply in the refrigerator.

Most people with intact immune systems do not suffer severe listeria infection. However, disease caused by listeria -- listeriosis -- can be very severe. Each year, the CDC estimates there are 1,600 cases in the U.S., with 260 deaths.

Listeriosis usually begins with diarrhea or other gut symptoms and progresses to fever and muscle aches. Symptoms vary from person to person, but may include headache, stiff neck, loss of balance, and convulsions.

Infections during pregnancy can lead to miscarriage, stillbirth, premature delivery, or dangerous infection of the newborn.

SOURCES: News releases, U.S. Food Safety Inspection Service.News release, Starbucks.News releases, Pilgrim's Pride. �2011 WebMD, LLC. All Rights Reserved.


Source: http://www.medicinenet.com/guide.asp?s=rss&a=147524&k=Womens_Health_General

health supplements for women health and fitness women health clubs for women pregnancy health issues

Male Circumcision Lowers Prevalence Of Penile Precancerous Lesions Among African Men


Main Category: Cervical Cancer / HPV Vaccine
Also Included In: Sexual Health / STDs;��Men's health;��Preventive Medicine
Article Date: 29 Jul 2011 - 1:00 PDT email icon email to a friendprinter icon printer friendlywrite icon opinions

Current Article Ratings:


Patient / Public: not yet rated
Healthcare Prof: not yet rated

A University of North Carolina-led international study shows that among Kenyan men, circumcision is associated with a lower prevalence of human papillomavirus-associated precancerous lesions of the penis. Human papillomavirus HPV is a sexually transmitted virus that plays an important role in genital cancers in men and women, including cancers of the penis and cervix.

Jennifer Smith, PhD, senior author, says, "Our data are the first to show that male circumcision may reduce HPV-associated penile precancerous lesions. This represents an additional public health benefit of male circumcision."

Smith is associate professor of epidemiology in the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health and a member of UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.

The study was published as an online manuscript in May 2011 in the International Journal of Cancer.

Smith explains, "The percentage of men with HPV-associated precancerous penile lesions was substantially higher among those who were not circumcised 26 percent- compared to those who were circumcised - .7 percent."

She adds, "Interventions that reduce HPV-associated penile lesions could be important to both men and women, because such lesions may increase HPV transmission from men to their sexual partners.

"Circumcision may also provide a useful intervention to prevent HPV-associated penile lesions and ultimately invasive cervical cancers in less developed countries, since prophylactic HPV vaccines may not be readily available to men, and current HPV vaccines do not include protection against all high-risk HPV types."

The study was part of a larger trial undertaken to determine the effectiveness of male circumcision in reducing HIV incidence conducted by Robert Bailey, PhD with the University of Illinois at Chicago. In the UNC-led study, 275 men participated: 151 who were circumcised and 124 who were not. The protocol included a visual inspection of the penis to identify lesions and photographs that were read independently by two observers as well as a sample of penile exfoliated cells that were tested for HPV infection.

Source: University of North Carolina


Please rate this article:
(Hover over the stars
then click to rate)
Patient / Public:
or Health Professional:

Bookmark and Share

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:




Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, UK
MediLexicon International Ltd � 2004-2011 All rights reserved.


Source: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/231930.php

women and health women health problems women for health womens health mag

Opting Out Or Overlooking Discrimination? Gender Barriers Persist In Workplace


Main Category: Psychology / Psychiatry
Also Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 29 Jul 2011 - 0:00 PDT email icon email to a friendprinter icon printer friendlywrite icon opinions

Current Article Ratings:


Patient / Public: 1 star

1 (1 votes)

Healthcare Prof: not yet rated

For the first time in history, the majority of Americans believe that women's job opportunities are equal to men's. For example, a 2005 Gallup poll indicated that 53 percent of Americans endorse the view that opportunities are equal, despite the fact that women still earn less than men, are underrepresented at the highest levels of many fields, and face other gender barriers such as bias against working mothers and inflexible workplaces.

New research from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University helps to explain why many Americans fail to see these persistent . The research demonstrates that the common American assumption that behavior is a product of personal choice fosters the belief that opportunities are equal and that gender barriers no longer exist in today's workplace.

The study, "Opting Out or Denying Discrimination? How the Framework of Free Choice in American Society Influences Perceptions of Gender Inequality," suggests that the assumption that women "opt out" of the workforce, or have the choice between career or family, promotes the belief that individuals are in control of their fates and are unconstrained by the environment.

The study was co-authored by Nicole M. Stephens, assistant professor of management and organizations at the Kellogg School of Management, and Cynthia S. Levine, a doctoral student in the psychology department at Stanford University. It will be published in a forthcoming issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

"Although we've made great strides toward gender equality in American society, significant obstacles still do, in fact, hold many women back from reaching the upper levels of their organizations," said Stephens. "In our research, we sought to determine how the very idea of 'opting out,' or making a choice to leave the workplace, may be maintaining these social and structural barriers by making it more difficult to recognize gender discrimination."

In one study, a group of stay-at-home mothers answered survey questions about how much choice they had in taking time off from their career and about their feelings of empowerment in making life plans and controlling their environment.

The participants then reviewed a set of real statistics about gender inequality in four fields - business, politics, law and science/engineering - and were asked to evaluate whether these barriers were due to bias against women or societal and workplace factors that make it difficult for women to hold these positions.

As predicted, most women explained their workplace departure as a matter of personal choice - which is reflective of the cultural understanding of choice in American society and underscores how the prevalence of choice influences behavior. These same women experienced a greater sense of personal well-being, but less often recognized the examples of discrimination and structural barriers presented in the statistics.

In a follow-up experiment, the researchers examined the consequences of the common cultural representation of women's workplace departure as a choice. Specifically, they examined how exposure to a choice message influenced Americans' beliefs about equality and the existence of discrimination. First, undergraduate students were subtly exposed to one of two posters on a wall about women leaving the workforce: either a poster with a choice message ("Choosing to Leave: Women's Experiences Away from the Workforce") or one in a control condition that simply said "Women at Home: Experiences Away from the Workforce."

Then, the participants were asked to take a survey about social issues. The participants exposed to the first poster with the choice message more strongly endorsed the belief that opportunities are equal and that gender discrimination is nonexistent, versus the control group who more clearly recognized discrimination. Interestingly, those participants who considered themselves to be feminists were more likely than other participants to identify discrimination.

"This second experiment demonstrates that even subtle exposure to the choice framework promotes the belief that discrimination no longer exists," said Levine. "One single brief encounter - such as a message in a poster - influenced the ability to recognize discrimination. Regular exposure to such messages could intensify over time, creating a vicious cycle that keeps women from reaching the top of high-status fields."

Overall, Stephens and Levine noted that while choice may be central to women's explanations of their own workplace departure, this framework is a double-edged sword.

"Choice has short-term personal benefits on well-being, but perhaps long-term detriments for women's advancement in the workplace collectively," said Stephens. "In general, as a society we need to raise awareness and increase attention for the gender barriers that still exist. By taking these barriers into account, the discussion about women's workplace departure could be reframed to recognize that many women do not freely choose to leave the workplace, but instead are pushed out by persistent workplace barriers such as limited workplace flexibility, unaffordable childcare, and negative stereotypes about working mothers."

Source:
Divya Menon
Association for Psychological Science


Please rate this article:
(Hover over the stars
then click to rate)
Patient / Public:
or Health Professional:

Bookmark and Share

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:




Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, UK
MediLexicon International Ltd � 2004-2011 All rights reserved.


Source: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/231885.php

womens health vitamins women reproductive health issues women health check up women to women health care

[CDC, Office of Women's Health, Health Matters for Women] National Men's Health Week, June 13-19, 2011

Men can be safer, stronger, and healthier. Take daily steps to prevent disease and injury and stay well. Improving men's health starts at home with individuals and families taking steps to live safer and healthier lives.

Get Your Check-Ups

Photo: A man talking to his healthcare professional.Just because you may feel fine doesn't mean you don't need your annual check-up. Certain diseases and conditions may not have symptoms, so check-ups help diagnose issues early or before they can become a problem. See your doctor or nurse for regular check-ups.

Need Affordable Healthcare?

Health services for individuals with no or low health coverage are available through federally-funded health centers, where the fee is based on what the individual can pay.

Know and Understand Your Numbers

Keep track of your numbers for blood pressure, blood sugar, cholesterol, body mass index (BMI), or any others you may have. These numbers can provide a glimpse of your health status and risk for certain diseases.� Be sure to ask your doctor or nurse what tests you need and how often you need them. If your numbers are high or low, he or she can explain what they mean and make recommendations to help you get them to a healthier range.

Practice prevention and make health an everyday option

There are numerous things you can do every day to improve your health and stay healthy. Many of which don't take a lot of time and cost very little, if anything.� Make healthy living a part of your daily routine.

Get Enough Sleep

Photo: A group of young men.Insufficient sleep is associated with a number of chronic diseases and conditions, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, and depression. Also, insufficient sleep is responsible for motor vehicle and machinery-related accidents, causing substantial injury and disability each year. Adults should get 7-9 hours of sleep per night, according to the National Sleep Foundation.

Be Smoke-Free

Avoid smoking and secondhand smoke. Inhaling other people's smoke causes health problems similar to those of smokers. Quitting smoking has immediate and long-term benefits. Within 20 minutes after smoking that last cigarette, your body begins a series of changes that continue for years.

Be Physically Active

Be active for at least 2� hours a week. Include activities that raise your breathing and heart rates and that strengthen your muscles. You don't have to do it all at once. Spread your activity out during the week, and break it into smaller chunks of time during the day.

Eat What Counts

Eat a variety of fruits and vegetables every day. Limit foods and drinks high in calories, sugar, salt, fat, and alcohol. Choose healthy snacks.

Get Vaccinated

Some adults incorrectly assume that the vaccines they received as children will protect them for the rest of their lives. Generally this is true, except that:

  • Some adults were never vaccinated as children.
  • Newer vaccines were not available when some adults were children.
  • Immunity can begin to fade over time.
  • As we age, we become more susceptible to serious disease caused by common infections (e.g., flu, pneumococcus).

Far too many adults become ill, are disabled, and die each year from diseases that could easily have been prevented by vaccines. Take a few minutes to find out if you are at risk for any of the diseases that can be prevented by immunization. Some immunizations are vital for most adults, especially senior citizens. Others are appropriate for only certain people.

Pay Attention to Signs and Symptoms

Discharge? Excessive thirst? Rash or sore? Problems with urination? Shortness of breath? These are only a few of the symptoms that males should pay attention to and see a doctor if they occur. If you have symptoms of any kind, be sure to see your doctor right away.

Send a Health-e-Card

More Information

Source: http://www2c.cdc.gov/podcasts/download.asp?af=h&f=7498788

women and mental health female health health insurance for women health magazine

Take Our Survey!

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Source: http://www.womenshealthmag.com/health/drive-to-succeed

health and fitness women health clubs for women pregnancy health issues health and fitness for women

Pharmacists Of The University Jena Analyze Why Men Suffer More Rarely From Inflammatory Diseases Than Women


Main Category: Men's health
Also Included In: Endocrinology
Article Date: 27 Jul 2011 - 0:00 PDT email icon email to a friendprinter icon printer friendlywrite icon opinions

Current Article Ratings:


Patient / Public: not yet rated
Healthcare Prof: not yet rated

It's all down to the testosterone: men are usually more muscular than women, they have deeper voices and more body hair. And men are less susceptible to inflammatory diseases and allergies than women. This is also due to the male sex hormones as pharmacists at the Friedrich Schiller University Jena (Germany) have shown in a recent study.

"It is mostly women who are affected by diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis or asthma", Professor Dr. Oliver Werz from the Jena University explains. Although this is a fact known for some time, the reasons for these differences are largely unknown. As the Jena Professor for pharmaceutical and medical chemistry and his team have revealed now, sexual hormones play an important role in this. The researchers report about this in the current edition of the scientific journal 'FASEB Journal' (DOI: 10.1096/fj.11-182758).

"In a series of analyses we have shown that cells from men and women react in a different manner to inflammatory stimuli," Dr. Carlo Pergola from the Institute of Pharmacy of University Jena explains. Thus, certain immune cells of women produced nearly twice as many pro-inflammatory substances than those of men. Together with colleagues from T�bingen (Germany), Stockholm (Sweden) and Naples (Italy) the Jena researchers pursued the molecular basis for these differences and published their findings in their current study. To this aim, they isolated immune cells of male and female donors and analyzed in test tubes the activity of the enzymes responsible for the production of pro-inflammatory substances. They found that in male cells the enzyme phospholipase D is less active than in the female ones. "Interestingly, the activity of the enzyme is reduced after treatment with testosterone also in the female immune cells", Dr. Pergola defines a crucial result.

Based on these findings, the Jena pharmacists concluded that the male sex hormones play a key role in the modulation of the immune response. This would also explain another phenomenon that has been previously noticed, that is, testosterone can protect men from arteriosclerosis.

Most importantly, the new knowledge should be taken into account in the assessment of new therapies and drugs for inflammatory diseases, Professor Werz stresses. "New therapies are usually still more often being tested on male volunteers or patients". But the Jena study indicates now that the results derived from male subjects cannot be immediately transcribed to women. On the contrary, a 'customized' therapy for men and women would be important.

Source: Friedrich Schiller University Jena


Please rate this article:
(Hover over the stars
then click to rate)
Patient / Public:
or Health Professional:

Bookmark and Share

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:




Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, UK
MediLexicon International Ltd � 2004-2011 All rights reserved.


Source: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/231779.php

health and women women health associates womens health fitness health and fitness tips

Muscular dystrophy drug trialled

The BBC reported that a new study has provided ?hope for Duchenne muscular dystrophy?. Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a progressive condition caused by mutations within a person?s DNA that prevent their body from producing the regular form of a protein called dystrophin. This protein forms vital connections in the muscle tissue, and without it the muscles degenerate, shortening a person?s lifespan.

In this study, UK researchers trialled a new drug designed to make the body bypass genetic mutations when producing dystrophin. When given to 19 children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, researchers found that higher doses of the drug, known as AVI-4658, led to an increase in dystrophin.

Researchers believe that drugs which are designed to make the body ?skip over? mutations in this way could be used to treat approximately 83% of Duchenne muscular dystrophy cases. However, the drug used in this trial only targeted mutations in a region implicated in 13% of cases.

This study was conducted well and demonstrated the potential of this approach for increasing the levels of dystrophin in the short term. The trial?s principal aim was to work out the appropriate dosages of the drug, therefore the drug?s safety profile and effects will need to be confirmed in larger, longer-term studies, particularly as patients would need to take it for the rest of their lives.

Where did the story come from?

The study was carried out by researchers from University College London Institute of Child Health and several other UK universities and hospitals. It was funded by the UK Medical Research Council and AVI BioPharma, the manufacturer of the drug being tested. The study was published in peer-reviewed�medical journal The Lancet.

The BBC covered this story well.

What kind of research was this?

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a genetic disease caused by mutations affecting the production of a protein called dystrophin. Dystrophin is important in the formation of structures within muscle fibre, but people who have problems producing dystrophin due to DMD experience progressive muscle weakness and muscle wasting. Due to the way the condition is inherited, DMD mainly affects males, being found in one in 3,500 newborn boys. Many patients with the disease lose the ability to walk by the age of 11, and have a shorter life expectancy. There is currently no cure for DMD.

The primary aim of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of a new drug, AVI-4658, at a range of increasing doses in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy aged between 5 and 15 who could still walk. The secondary aim of this trial was to assess the ability of this drug to restore levels of the dystrophin protein.

To explore these aims, researchers conducted an open-label (non-blinded), phase 2, dose-escalation study. This is the appropriate trial design to answer this question. However, larger, long-term trials will be required to confirm the findings from this trial, and to determine whether treatment with this drug can cause clinically significant improvements, particularly improvements that can be sustained in the long-term.

What did the research involve?

In Duchenne muscular dystrophy, patients have genetic mutations which interfere with the production of the protein dystrophin, causing a non-functional version of the protein to be produced. This is because these mutations cause abnormalities in the DNA sequence that the body would use as a blueprint for making dystrophin. In this study, the researchers used a drug called AVI-4658 to encourage the cellular machinery to ?skip? over the genetic region containing the mutation, allowing a shortened but functional version of the protein to be produced. This technique has already been shown to work in a laboratory setting and in animal models.

The researchers recruited nineteen patients aged between 5 and 15 with Duchenne muscular dystrophy caused by a mutation in a particular region of the DMD gene (called exon 51). These patients could still walk. They were given weekly intravenous infusions of the drug (AVI-4658) for 12 weeks. The study tested a range of drug doses, ranging from 0.5mg per kg of body weight up to 20mg per kg of body weight. Three to four patients received each dose. Participants had a small muscle sample (biopsy) taken before starting treatment and after the 12 weeks of treatment so that researchers could examine how muscle tissue changed in response to treatment.

The levels of the dystrophin protein that treatment produced and the drug?s ability to cause ?skipping? over the region with the mutation were assessed.

What were the basic results?

The drug, AVI-4658, was tolerated well, with no serious adverse drug-related events. AVI-4658 induced ?skipping? over the region with the mutation in all participants, and seven patients had a post-treatment increase in dystrophin protein levels in their muscle. The level of dystrophin protein produced generally increased the higher dose of the drug, with a dose of 2mg/kg being the lowest dose to produce an effect on dystrophin levels.

The researchers also confirmed that the dystrophin protein produced appeared to be working properly, as the muscle fibres producing dystrophin also had increased levels of other proteins, which normally bind to dystrophin. Some of the participants treated with higher doses of the drug also showed a reduction in immune system cells that are normally seen in the muscle of DMD patients.

How did the researchers interpret the results?

The researchers concluded that the safety and efficacy [effectiveness under test conditions] seen in this research ?show the potential of AVI-4658 to become a disease-modifying drug for Duchenne muscular dystrophy?.

Conclusion

This was a well-performed study that has demonstrated the potential of this approach for increasing the levels of dystrophin in boys with DMD. However, it is important to note that this was a small, short-term study primarily aimed at helping to set the appropriate dosage for the drug rather than establishing its effectiveness. The safety profile and effects of the drug will now need to be confirmed in larger, longer-term clinical trials, particularly as this drug would have to be given to patients for the rest of their life. It would also be crucial to determine whether the biological improvements seen in muscle tissue translate into significant clinical improvement in patients? symptoms.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy can be caused by different mutations in the dystrophin gene. It is thought that "skipping" regions containing mutations could treat around 83% of the genetic errors causing Duchenne muscular dystrophy. However, different drugs would have to be developed to target mutations in different regions. This drug targets mutations in exon 51, which occur in 13% of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

That said, this initial set of results shows some promise, and if the drug can perform well in future trials then it may become a viable option for treating a this debilitating, life-limiting disease.

Links To The Headlines

Molecular scalpel hope for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. BBC News, July 25 2011

Links To Science

Cirak S, Arechavala-Gomeza V, Guglieri Metal. Exon skipping and dystrophin restoration in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy after systemic phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer treatment: an open-label, phase 2, dose-escalation study. The Lancet, Early Online Publication, July 25 2011

Source: http://www.nhs.uk/news/2011/07July/Pages/research-new-drug-muscular-dystrophy.aspx

female health health insurance for women health magazine mens health

Memory loss 'reversed in monkeys'

?Memory decline reversed in tests on monkeys,? reported The Daily Telegraph. The newspaper went on to say that ?a cure for memory loss in middle and old age could be a step closer thanks to a drug which restores the brain to a more youthful state?.

This news story is based on research examining differences in the rate at which brain cells fired in monkeys of various ages. It then looked at the effect of several drugs on these rates. The researchers found that the rate of firing of specific brain cells decreased in older monkeys. After being given some of the drugs, the brain cell firing frequency in middle age and older adults increased.

The researchers say the continuous firing of these brain cells is needed for ?working memory?; a type of memory essential for abstract thought and completing complicated tasks.

This was an interesting and well-conducted animal study that could have important implications for addressing age-related memory loss. However, much further research is needed before we can be confident that the results apply to humans and can be used as a treatment for memory loss.

Where did the story come from?

The study was carried out by researchers from Yale University in the US and was funded by the National Institute of Aging, a part of the US National Institutes of Health.

It was published in the peer-reviewed medical journal Nature.

The lead researcher and Yale University receive royalties from Shire Pharmaceuticals from the sales of extended-release guanfacine, a version of the drug used in this study.

Generally, the media reported the story accurately. Although much of the focus was on guanfacine, many other drugs were also included in the study.

What kind of research was this?

This was an animal study that examined the effect of a drug called guanfacine on working memory in middle aged and elderly monkeys. Working memory is responsible for retaining information that is no longer available. The ability to do this is essential for abstract thought and completing complicated tasks. The researchers say that tasks requiring working memory include summoning information from long-term memory, such as where you left your keys, or remembering a recent event, such as a new phone number.

This particular animal model was chosen because previous research has found that working memory starts to decline in middle age in both humans and monkeys.

The researchers looked at whether normal ageing alters the functioning of brain cells in a part of the brain called the prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for working memory. Successful working memory is believed to require continuous communication between brain cells in this region.

Changes in the chemical environment in this region can alter the number of times prefrontal cortex brain cells ?fire? (communicate with each other) by weakening the connections between the cells. It is thought that the less frequently these cells fire, the less reliable an individual?s working memory will be. Researchers believe that a particular molecule, called cAMP, keeps these brain cells from firing.

Animal studies are useful ways to conduct preliminarily research that could not be carried out in humans. Follow up clinical trials are needed before the results can be confirmed to apply to humans.

What did the research involve?

The researchers compared the frequency of brain cell firing in the prefrontal cortex during working memory tasks in young adult, middle age and elderly monkeys. They studied the performance of six monkeys: two young adults, two middle age, and two elderly monkeys, on working memory tasks which required them to remember the location of an object.

The researchers recorded the brain activity of each monkey during this task and measured the firing frequency in different types of brain cells. These measurements were used to compare the level of firing across the three age groups, and to establish a starting rate in each age group. Following this, the monkeys were treated with different drugs, and the firing rates were measured again and compared against these starting firing rates.

The researchers wanted to see whether treatment with the multiple drugs could increase the frequency with which the brain cells fired. They tested drugs that are known to decrease the action of cAMP, increase the action of cAMP, or attach to the parts of brain cells that cAMP acts on. The drugs were applied to the monkeys? brains, and the same task was repeated while the researchers recorded the brain activity and measured the frequency with which the brain cells fired.

The researchers compared the firing frequency data from the first set of experiments to establish whether there were any differences between the different age groups. They then compared the data from the second set of experiments to data from the first set of experiments, to establish whether or not the drugs had any impact on brain cell activity while the monkeys were performing tasks that needed them to use working memory.

The working memory tasks used during this study are commonly used in both animal and human studies.

What were the basic results?

During the initial task, which required the monkeys to remember the physical location of an object, the researchers found that the older the monkey, the less frequently their brain cells fired. That is, the young adult monkeys? brain cells fired the most frequently, and the elderly monkeys? brain cells fired the least frequently. The change in firing rate was only found to occur in the brain cells that fire when the object was no longer present, as opposed to those brain cells that are responsible for recognising the presence of the object and therefore fire while the object was present.

When the same task was performed after the application of the different drugs, the researchers found that after being given the drugs that decrease the action of cAMP, the brain cell firing frequency in middle age and older adults increased. When drugs that increase the action of cAMP were used, the brain cell firing frequency decreased.

How did the researchers interpret the results?

The researchers say their results show a ?physiological basis for age-related working memory decline in the primate brain?, and that this decline can be reversed through treatment of the brain?s chemical environment. They go on to say that ?there is potential to restore at least some cognitive abilities in the elderly.?

Conclusion

This was a well-conducted animal study that examined the functional basis for a specific type of age-related memory loss. Research into memory and age-related memory loss is increasingly important as our society continues to age. However, results from animal studies, while promising, still need to be interpreted cautiously.

It is unclear at this point whether the drug used in this research will work the same way in humans. Well-designed clinical trials will be able to examine the impact of the drug on memory loss in humans. However, until the results of such trials are available, how much this study can apply to human memory loss is unclear.

Several other aspects of this study, and the interpretation of its results, are important to note:

  • The study did not focus on comparing how well the monkeys actually performed the memory tasks, either between age groups or after the drugs were given. Rather, it focused on measuring brain activity, which is thought to be related to task performance. To get an accurate idea of the real effects of the drugs on monkeys of different ages, future studies will need to measure effects on task performance directly. Any such effects in monkeys may not carry over ? or carry over safely ? to humans. In short, there is a long way to go before this has a practical human application.
  • The drug guanfacine mentioned in news reports, is not the only drug studied with beneficial effects. Other drugs that either decreased the action of cAMP, or blocked the specific part of the brain cell on which cAMP acts, also improved the firing frequency in older monkeys.
  • In this study, the drugs were applied directly into the brain region, not taken in pill or injection form. This is clearly not feasible in humans, and whether or not the drug will have the same impact when delivered differently remains to be seen. However, the researchers do say that previous research has shown that guanfacine enhances working memory performance in animals when the subjects were given the drugs and it was not applied directly to the brain.
  • The study only involved six monkeys, which makes the results and the differences found more difficult to interpret. However, as this was a preliminary study that aimed to examine the effect of the drug in principle, and the researchers plan to continue this study in humans in accordance with established clinical trial guidelines, the small sample size is less problematic.
  • The type of memory loss examined in this study is a common characteristic of normal ageing, and includes things such as forgetfulness and distractibility. It is not the same as the memory loss seen in specific diseases such as Alzheimer?s disease.

Links To The Headlines

Forget-me-not: Memory loss could be reversible thanks to medical tweaks made to 'mental sketch pad'. Daily Mail, July 28 2011

Memory decline reversed in tests on monkeys. The Daily Telegraph, July 28 2011

Links To Science

Wang M, Gamo NJ, Yang Y et al. Neuronal basis of age-related working memory decline. Nature, Published online July 27 2011

Source: http://www.nhs.uk/news/2011/07July/Pages/memory-loss-reversed-in-monkey-research.aspx

women’s health womens health magazines womens health advice womens health insurance

Large Increase In Pregnancy-Related Strokes, CDC Study


Featured Article
Academic Journal
Main Category: Stroke
Also Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology;��Pregnancy / Obstetrics
Article Date: 29 Jul 2011 - 2:00 PDT email icon email to a friendprinter icon printer friendlywrite icon opinions

Current Article Ratings:


Patient / Public: not yet rated
Healthcare Prof: 4 stars

4 (1 votes)


There has been a large increase in pregnancy-related strokes in the US, due mainly to women having more risk factors such as obesity and high blood pressure, say researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) who write about their findings in the 28 July online issue of Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association.

Lead author Dr Elena V Kuklina, senior service fellow and epidemiologist at the CDC's Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, told the media she was surprised at the "substantial" increase:

"Our results indicate an urgent need to take a closer look. Stroke is such a debilitating condition. We need to put more effort into prevention," she urged.

Kuklina and colleagues report that the overall rate of women having strokes while they are expecting a baby and in the three months after birth went up 54% in the 12 years leading up to 2006-07. They suggest the main reason is because of high blood pressure and obesity.

For their study, they used data on 5 to 8 million discharge records from 1,000 hospitals covering the period 1994-95 to 2006-07. From these they could see how the rate of strokes had changed in women who attended hospital during pregnancy, during delivery, and recently after giving birth.

They found that:

  • Pregnancy-related stroke hospitalizations went up by 54%, from 4,085 to 6,293 over the 12 years leading up to 2006- 07.

  • Strokes in pregnancy went up by 47% (from 0.15 to 0.22 per 1,000 deliveries).

  • Strokes recently after giving birth went up by 83% (from 0.12 to 0.22 per 1,000 deliveries).

  • Strokes during delivery did not change (they stayed at 0.27 per 1,000 deliveries).

  • In 2006-07, about 32% and 53% of women who were hospitalized after having strokes in pregnancy and shortly after giving birth respectively had either high blood pressure or heart disease.

  • Increased prevalence of these two conditions over the 12 years up to 2006-07 accounted for almost all the increase in stroke hospitalization after giving birth that occurred in the same period.
Kuklina said a person's stroke risk is not that high when they are relatively healthy. However, the number of women entering pregnancy with a risk factor for stroke is increasing. Such risk factors include obesity, chronic hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes or congenital heart disease.

"Since pregnancy by itself is a risk factor, if you have one of these other stroke risk factors, it doubles the risk," so it is best to enter pregnancy with good cardiovascular health, without additional risk factors, said Kuklina.

We need to give doctors and patients better guidelines for monitoring and caring for women before, during and after childbirth, she added.

There is also a need to do more research on pregnant women specifically, said Kuklina, who said they could only find 11 cases of stroke related to pregnancy when she and her colleagues searched the literature to review the field.

Another problem is that because of the risk of harming the fetus, pregnant women are rarely included in clinical trials, so we know little about which drugs can safely be prescribed to women with an increased risk of stroke.

The study was funded by the CDC.

"Trends in Pregnancy Hospitalizations That Included a Stroke in the United States From 1994 to 2007: Reasons for Concern?"
Elena V. Kuklina, Xin Tong, Pooja Bansil, Mary G. George, and William M. Callaghan.
Stroke, published online before print 28 July 2011, doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.610592
Link to Abstract.

Additional source: AHA.

Written by: Catharine Paddock, PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today


Please rate this article:
(Hover over the stars
then click to rate)
Patient / Public:
or Health Professional:

Bookmark and Share

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:




Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, UK
MediLexicon International Ltd � 2004-2011 All rights reserved.


Source: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/231938.php

women health check up women to women health care women health and fitness womens health

Computer-Aided Mammography Doesn't Improve Breast Cancer Detection: Study

By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, July 27 (HealthDay News) -- The widely used mammography software known as computer-aided detection (CAD) doesn't improve detection of invasive breast cancer, new research suggests.

But CAD does increase the chances that a woman will be called back for further testing, according to the study, published July 27 in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

''All in all, we found very little impact of CAD on the outcomes of mammography," said study author Dr. Joshua J. Fenton, an assistant professor of family and community medicine at the University of California, Davis.

With colleagues, Fenton analyzed 1.6 million screening mammograms from seven states and the records of the nearly 685,000 women who got them from 1998 to 2006. Three out of four mammograms done in the United States include CAD, the authors said.

To determine if CAD aided breast cancer detection, they examined the detection rate when the software was used, and the stage and size of the cancer when diagnosed. They also looked at how many women were called back for further testing who didn't have breast cancer.

"We found that CAD has a slightly increased chance [that] a woman would be recalled unnecessarily for further testing, but it did not increase the chance that the breast cancer would be detected at an earlier stage," Fenton said.

"For every 200 women who are screened with CAD who have a second mammogram, one additional woman is called back unnecessarily for further testing," he said.

When Fenton's team looked only at early-stage cancer known as DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ), they found a trend to increased detection with CAD, but it was not statistically significant.

Overall, the detection rates with and without CAD were similar, the study said.

Use of CAD, which identifies areas of potential abnormalities so the radiologist can take a closer look, has boomed in recent years, even though previous research has not demonstrated a clear benefit, Fenton said.

Congress mandated that Medicare reimburse for CAD in 2001, and most private insurers followed suit, he said, explaining the growing popularity.

Based on previous research, Fenton reported in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2007 that CAD was linked with reduced accuracy of mammogram interpretations but did not affect the detection rate of invasive breast cancer.

In the current study, Fenton's team said the costs of CAD -- about an additional $12 per mammogram -- may outweigh the potential benefits. Annually, direct costs to Medicare top $30 million, a study published last year in the Journal of the American College of Radiology found.

Dr. Carol Lee, a New York radiologist and spokesperson for the Breast Imaging Commission of the American College of Radiology, said the new study looks at CAD in real-life settings. "What this is saying is, in actual practice, when you look in the community, it doesn't seem to be living up to what earlier studies with different designs promised," she said.

But, "I don't think based on this study we should abandon the use of CAD," she added.

For one thing, it's not clear whether the radiologists were trained to use CAD correctly, she said. The authors also point this out as a possible limitation.

The trend to CAD picking up more early-stage cancers is worthwhile, she said.

Lee also said a woman is unlikely to know whether her mammogram included CAD unless she asks the doctor.

In its practice guidelines on mammography, the American College of Radiology says that CAD ''may slightly increase the sensitivity of mammographic interpretations." It also notes that CAD may be linked with increased recall of patients, some unnecessary. Under the guidelines, CAD is not considered standard of care.

MedicalNewsCopyright � 2011 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

SOURCES: Joshua J. Fenton, M.D., M.P.H., assistant professor, family and community medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento; Carol Lee, M.D., spokesperson and former chair, American College of Radiology, Breast Imaging Commission, and New York radiologist; July 27, 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, online


Source: http://www.medicinenet.com/guide.asp?s=rss&a=147506&k=Womens_Health_General

health women womens issues wellness

[CDC, Office of Women's Health, Health Matters for Women] National HIV Testing Day June 27, 2011

June 27 is National HIV Testing Day, which promotes testing as an important strategy to prevent and treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Persons who learn that they have HIV can receive appropriate treatment, monitoring, and health care, and in doing so, delay disease progression, extend their lives, and reduce the chance that they will transmit the virus to others. To increase HIV testing, improve awareness of HIV status, and enable earlier diagnosis of HIV infection, CDC recommends that all persons aged 13--64 years be screened for HIV in health-care settings with prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection ?0.1% (1). CDC also recommends that persons with increased risk for HIV be retested at least annually.

At the end of 2008, approximately 20% of the estimated 1.2 million persons living with HIV were undiagnosed and unaware of their infection (2). In 2008, an estimated 33% of all HIV diagnoses were late diagnoses, often made after persons had already developed acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) (3). Also, a recent study of men who have sex with men found a 6.9% prevalence of new infections among those who had tested negative during the preceding year (4). These findings indicate the continuing importance of getting tested for HIV, and for persons at higher risk for HIV, getting retested at least annually.

Information about HIV testing is available at http://www.cdc.gov/features/hivtesting and http://www.hivtest.org.

References

  1. CDC. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR 2006;55(No. RR-14).
  2. CDC. HIV surveillance---United States, 1981--2008. MMWR 2011;60:689--93.
  3. CDC. HIV/AIDS surveillance report, 2009. Vol. 21. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2011.
  4. CDC. HIV testing among men who have sex with men---21 cities, United States, 2008. MMWR 2011;60:694--9.

Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from typeset documents. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.

**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

Source: http://www2c.cdc.gov/podcasts/download.asp?af=h&f=7640163

women health insurance yeast infection women and health camden pregnant women health insurance

Saturday, 30 July 2011

[CDC, Office of Women's Health, Health Matters for Women] National Men's Health Week, June 13-19, 2011

Men can be safer, stronger, and healthier. Take daily steps to prevent disease and injury and stay well. Improving men's health starts at home with individuals and families taking steps to live safer and healthier lives.

Get Your Check-Ups

Photo: A man talking to his healthcare professional.Just because you may feel fine doesn't mean you don't need your annual check-up. Certain diseases and conditions may not have symptoms, so check-ups help diagnose issues early or before they can become a problem. See your doctor or nurse for regular check-ups.

Need Affordable Healthcare?

Health services for individuals with no or low health coverage are available through federally-funded health centers, where the fee is based on what the individual can pay.

Know and Understand Your Numbers

Keep track of your numbers for blood pressure, blood sugar, cholesterol, body mass index (BMI), or any others you may have. These numbers can provide a glimpse of your health status and risk for certain diseases.� Be sure to ask your doctor or nurse what tests you need and how often you need them. If your numbers are high or low, he or she can explain what they mean and make recommendations to help you get them to a healthier range.

Practice prevention and make health an everyday option

There are numerous things you can do every day to improve your health and stay healthy. Many of which don't take a lot of time and cost very little, if anything.� Make healthy living a part of your daily routine.

Get Enough Sleep

Photo: A group of young men.Insufficient sleep is associated with a number of chronic diseases and conditions, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, and depression. Also, insufficient sleep is responsible for motor vehicle and machinery-related accidents, causing substantial injury and disability each year. Adults should get 7-9 hours of sleep per night, according to the National Sleep Foundation.

Be Smoke-Free

Avoid smoking and secondhand smoke. Inhaling other people's smoke causes health problems similar to those of smokers. Quitting smoking has immediate and long-term benefits. Within 20 minutes after smoking that last cigarette, your body begins a series of changes that continue for years.

Be Physically Active

Be active for at least 2� hours a week. Include activities that raise your breathing and heart rates and that strengthen your muscles. You don't have to do it all at once. Spread your activity out during the week, and break it into smaller chunks of time during the day.

Eat What Counts

Eat a variety of fruits and vegetables every day. Limit foods and drinks high in calories, sugar, salt, fat, and alcohol. Choose healthy snacks.

Get Vaccinated

Some adults incorrectly assume that the vaccines they received as children will protect them for the rest of their lives. Generally this is true, except that:

  • Some adults were never vaccinated as children.
  • Newer vaccines were not available when some adults were children.
  • Immunity can begin to fade over time.
  • As we age, we become more susceptible to serious disease caused by common infections (e.g., flu, pneumococcus).

Far too many adults become ill, are disabled, and die each year from diseases that could easily have been prevented by vaccines. Take a few minutes to find out if you are at risk for any of the diseases that can be prevented by immunization. Some immunizations are vital for most adults, especially senior citizens. Others are appropriate for only certain people.

Pay Attention to Signs and Symptoms

Discharge? Excessive thirst? Rash or sore? Problems with urination? Shortness of breath? These are only a few of the symptoms that males should pay attention to and see a doctor if they occur. If you have symptoms of any kind, be sure to see your doctor right away.

Send a Health-e-Card

More Information

Source: http://www2c.cdc.gov/podcasts/download.asp?af=h&f=7498788

health club women health care for women international mental health and women health fitness tips

Opting Out Or Overlooking Discrimination? Gender Barriers Persist In Workplace


Main Category: Psychology / Psychiatry
Also Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 29 Jul 2011 - 0:00 PDT email icon email to a friendprinter icon printer friendlywrite icon opinions

Current Article Ratings:


Patient / Public: 1 star

1 (1 votes)

Healthcare Prof: not yet rated

For the first time in history, the majority of Americans believe that women's job opportunities are equal to men's. For example, a 2005 Gallup poll indicated that 53 percent of Americans endorse the view that opportunities are equal, despite the fact that women still earn less than men, are underrepresented at the highest levels of many fields, and face other gender barriers such as bias against working mothers and inflexible workplaces.

New research from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University helps to explain why many Americans fail to see these persistent . The research demonstrates that the common American assumption that behavior is a product of personal choice fosters the belief that opportunities are equal and that gender barriers no longer exist in today's workplace.

The study, "Opting Out or Denying Discrimination? How the Framework of Free Choice in American Society Influences Perceptions of Gender Inequality," suggests that the assumption that women "opt out" of the workforce, or have the choice between career or family, promotes the belief that individuals are in control of their fates and are unconstrained by the environment.

The study was co-authored by Nicole M. Stephens, assistant professor of management and organizations at the Kellogg School of Management, and Cynthia S. Levine, a doctoral student in the psychology department at Stanford University. It will be published in a forthcoming issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

"Although we've made great strides toward gender equality in American society, significant obstacles still do, in fact, hold many women back from reaching the upper levels of their organizations," said Stephens. "In our research, we sought to determine how the very idea of 'opting out,' or making a choice to leave the workplace, may be maintaining these social and structural barriers by making it more difficult to recognize gender discrimination."

In one study, a group of stay-at-home mothers answered survey questions about how much choice they had in taking time off from their career and about their feelings of empowerment in making life plans and controlling their environment.

The participants then reviewed a set of real statistics about gender inequality in four fields - business, politics, law and science/engineering - and were asked to evaluate whether these barriers were due to bias against women or societal and workplace factors that make it difficult for women to hold these positions.

As predicted, most women explained their workplace departure as a matter of personal choice - which is reflective of the cultural understanding of choice in American society and underscores how the prevalence of choice influences behavior. These same women experienced a greater sense of personal well-being, but less often recognized the examples of discrimination and structural barriers presented in the statistics.

In a follow-up experiment, the researchers examined the consequences of the common cultural representation of women's workplace departure as a choice. Specifically, they examined how exposure to a choice message influenced Americans' beliefs about equality and the existence of discrimination. First, undergraduate students were subtly exposed to one of two posters on a wall about women leaving the workforce: either a poster with a choice message ("Choosing to Leave: Women's Experiences Away from the Workforce") or one in a control condition that simply said "Women at Home: Experiences Away from the Workforce."

Then, the participants were asked to take a survey about social issues. The participants exposed to the first poster with the choice message more strongly endorsed the belief that opportunities are equal and that gender discrimination is nonexistent, versus the control group who more clearly recognized discrimination. Interestingly, those participants who considered themselves to be feminists were more likely than other participants to identify discrimination.

"This second experiment demonstrates that even subtle exposure to the choice framework promotes the belief that discrimination no longer exists," said Levine. "One single brief encounter - such as a message in a poster - influenced the ability to recognize discrimination. Regular exposure to such messages could intensify over time, creating a vicious cycle that keeps women from reaching the top of high-status fields."

Overall, Stephens and Levine noted that while choice may be central to women's explanations of their own workplace departure, this framework is a double-edged sword.

"Choice has short-term personal benefits on well-being, but perhaps long-term detriments for women's advancement in the workplace collectively," said Stephens. "In general, as a society we need to raise awareness and increase attention for the gender barriers that still exist. By taking these barriers into account, the discussion about women's workplace departure could be reframed to recognize that many women do not freely choose to leave the workplace, but instead are pushed out by persistent workplace barriers such as limited workplace flexibility, unaffordable childcare, and negative stereotypes about working mothers."

Source:
Divya Menon
Association for Psychological Science


Please rate this article:
(Hover over the stars
then click to rate)
Patient / Public:
or Health Professional:

Bookmark and Share

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:




Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, UK
MediLexicon International Ltd � 2004-2011 All rights reserved.


Source: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/231885.php

health and women women health associates womens health fitness health and fitness tips